| Loc.1# | Bank2 stability | Bank vegetation* (%) | Land use beyond riparian** (%) | Corridor width (feet) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | S | H | N | Left descending bank | Right descending bank | |||
| 2184 | E | 25 | 40 | 35 | 00 | 100F | >100 | >100 |
| 1608 | G | 10 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 100R | >100 | >50 |
| 2506 | G | 30 | 40 | 30 | 00 | 50F-50P | >100 | >50 |
| 2458 | G | 30 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 50F-50R | 1-10 | >100 |
| 2314 | G | 20 | 30 | 30 | 20 | 100R | >50 | >25 |
| 1624 | F | 10 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 75F-25P | >100 | >100 |
| 2511 | G | 20 | 55 | 40 | 05 | 50F-50P | >50 | >75 |
| 2507 | G | 20 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 100P | >50 | >75 |
| 2234 | NA | 20 | 30 | 50 | 00 | 100P | >100 | >75 |
| 2509 | G | 25 | 20 | 50 | 05 | 50F-50P | >100 | >100 |
| 1985 | E | 30 | 30 | 40 | 00 | 50P-50R | >100 | >100 |
| 1598 | G | 20 | 20 | 30 | 30 | 100P | >50 | >50 |
| 2507 | G | 20 | 30 | 30 | 20 | 100P | >50 | >50 |
| 1606 | G | 10 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 100F | >100 | >100 |
| 1601 | E | 30 | 30 | 40 | 00 | 100F | >100 | >100 |
| 1592 | G | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 100P | 1-10 | 1-10 |
| 2183 | G | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 50F-50P | >100 | >100 |
| 2197 | G | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 50F-50P | >100 | >100 |
| 1610 | G | 30 | 30 | 40 | 00 | 100R | >100 | >100 |
| 1975 | G | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 50F-50P | >100 | >100 |
| Total Avg. | G=74% E=21% F=5% P=0% | 20 | 29 | 35 | 16 | >100 = 60% >75 = 7.5% >50 = 22.5% >25 = 2.5% 1-10 = 7.5% | ||
1Location numbers correspond with those found in Figure BC01 and Table BC02.
2Bank stability was ranked as E=excellent, G=good, F=fair, and P=poor.
*Bank vegetation was classified as: T=trees, S=shrubs, H=herbaceous, and N=none.
**Land use beyond riparian corridor was classified as: F=forest, P=pasture, R=residential.
